Ja Morant Demonstrates Another Side To Financial Trauma
The Rapid Accumulation Of Wealth With a Poor Understanding of Risk Management
“70% of lotto winners lose or spend all their money in 5 years or less,” according to a Reader's Digest article.
“78% of professional athletes go broke after just 3 years of retirement,” according to Craig Brown, an NKSFB Sports Business Division partner.
Although seemingly unrelated, what’s not being talked about in both these instances is the rapid accumulation of wealth combined with a poor understanding of risk management, and the naivety that the money will always be there.
Ja Morant, a NBA player for the Memphis Grizzlies, is in headlines due to his recent suspension after he appeared to flash a gun in an Instagram video. This is not the first incident that he’s appeared in the media due to his behavior however. As many on social media flock to defend or condemn his actions and persona by drawing parallels between his seemingly privileged childhood and two parent household, a lightbulb went off for me.
People tend to assign a greater set of expectations around education, behavior, and other means of showing up socially to the experiences we have—or didn’t have— in our upbringing than they do to the personal choices and decisions we may make despite them. Tied specifically into money, the assumption that because someone has always had money or didn’t experience poverty, automatically makes them a good steward of money is a false one and vice versa.
In examining this situation through the lens of financial trauma I see two unique perspectives;
The perspective of the spectators that feel like Ja is dangerously close to messing up the opportunity he has and the money that came with it
The (possible) perspective of the athlete in the assumption that his actions and behaviors are of minimal consequence and thus the money will always be there
So of course the commentary on both sides of these perspectives is really a reflection of the experiences, anxieties, and traumas of those who are placing themselves in his shoes.
The second perspective, or the feeling of ‘money invincibility’ is not one I can say I’ve experienced personally, but one I have witnessed occur in real time.
In fact, early in my banking career I came across a customer who came into the bank almost every week—sometimes multiple times a week— to withdraw large sums of cash from his account. He always seemed to have one or two people with him and was always in a good mood. He was a younger guy and very talkative. Over the period of time he would come in I would learn that the money came from an inheritance and that it was more money than he’d ever had before. I don’t remember the specific amount but it couldn’t have been much more than $100,000 and after a period of weeks, maybe months I remember him coming in to check the balance and his money being nearly gone.
His excitement and company no longer accompanied him.
Later I would learn finally that he used the money to party and buy items and drugs because he didn’t have money previously and he gained a bunch of friends and popularity because of how generous he was. I don’t know if he thought it would be there forever, but I know he definitely thought it would have lasted much longer than it did.
When we think about financial trauma we often look at it from a lens of lack—that is to say events, situations, conditions, etc. marked by not having or not having enough money. But financial trauma works both ways. That is just one of many examples where individuals without previous experience or education in managing money came into large sums of money and had no idea what to do with it, how to preserve it, and ultimately was left with the regret of what they would do differently if they knew better before—and some DO know better before but get so caught up in money invincibility that they cease to look at money rationally. Similar to the way people navigating a survival mode operate despite knowing better because they need to survive. This is the failure of financial literacy, because despite understanding concepts and correlations related to money, our feelings and beliefs may simply override what we know or understand and allow us to make decisions to the contrary comfortably.
While Ja doesn’t need my justification or approval to make the decisions he’s making I do think it an example like many others where the feeling money invincibility—or nonchalance— has been put on display and ultimately has threatened the future livelihood of those in the public eye. Perhaps his actions don’t come with the perceived risks civilians cringe and worry about for him, or perhaps they do.
What do you think?
As a Certified Financial Education Instructor (CFEI®), Registered Financial Consultant (RFC®) and Accredited Financial Counselor candidate (AFC®) I have the skills you need to improve your knowledge, relationship, and behaviors around money. I help you overcome financial trauma and accomplish your financial goals. Reach out with inquiries regarding 1x1 or group bundle sessions or have me speak at your organization. Rahkim@rahkimsabree.com
If you’ve enjoyed any of my posts please share and encourage others to subscribe. Also consider subscribing to the paid version as well. I’ve been adding more exclusive content for the paid subscribers that you simply won’t get here. If you’re looking to level up financially in 2023 definitely hit that button. Also let me know what things you’d want to see on the exclusive side. Expert interviews? Live Q&A? Freebies? Tools? Giveaways?
Lastly don’t forget to check out and rate the podcast wherever you listen to podcasts.
Thank you always,
"People tend to assign a greater set of expectations around education, behavior, and other means of showing up socially to the experiences we have—or didn’t have— in our upbringing than they do to the personal choices and decisions we may make despite them."
I appreciate you going a level or two deeper than the obvious surface conversation regarding his behavior potentially compromising his bag.
The part about this conversation that bothers me the most, is that people try to act like because he came from a two-parent household, and went to a private school, that he is trying to be something that he's not.
I personally know hard working moms and dads from tough upbringings that moved their families to the suburbs, but it most certainly did not change their mental, emotional, and psychological makeup. Changing zip codes does not change who we are.
Additionally, I know several guys from the hood that got scholarships to go and play at private schools tuition free. Again, we can't presume just because you are at a private school and/or smart enough to handle the academics, that you are not about that life.
Most of us are adept at navigating the rules and parameters of the game in order to accomplish certain goals, right? The same thing applies for them, except the component of financial invincibility comes into play in a way for them that it does not for the average citizen - particularly a person of color from very humble means.
I've suffered from money invisibility. It definitely sucks. Now I've got to earn it again. I know now 😮💨